This combination of agreements includes only the owners of me, ours, theirs, his, theirs and yours. They always precede a noun, but not the one with which they agree: verbs must agree with their subjects in person and in numbers, and sometimes also in sex. Articles and adjectives must correspond, in the case, the number and gender, to the underlyings they change. 7So adjective and reduplication acts as a chord of numbers. At least for verbs, such an agreement seems to be semantic; the NP, whose plurality is signalled by the repeat, can have no other indication of plurality: what prompted you to seek the encrypted agreement? Please tell us where you read or heard it (including the quote, if possible). Another characteristic is the adequacy of participations that have different shapes for different sexes: such a concordance is also found with predictors: the man is great („man is great“) vs. the chair is large („the chair is large“). (In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) Indeed, noun modifiers in languages such as German and Latin coincide with their subtantives in numbers, sex and cases; The three categories are mixed into declination paradigms. 6 The numberplural of a substantive expression can manifest itself by redecorating adjectives in this NP.

Multicriteral reduplication is also observed in predictive adjectives and inclinations, the reduplication characterizing the plurality of a direct object or an outside subject: compared to English, Latin is an example of a strongly arrowed language. The consequences of the agreement are therefore: modern English does not have a very large consensus, although it exists. (This last sentence is passive; it might be better to construct the sentence more actively by identifying – and stressing – those who have objected: „Community members have raised a number of objections during the public statement.“ Occasionally, however, the identity of the actor or actor is irrelevant, or the author wishes to highlight or conceal their identity. This is why passive construction is not categorically false – it is just less direct.) In Nynorsk, Norway, Swedish, Icelandic and Norway, current participants must agree on gender, number and certainty whether the participatory party is in an attribute or predictive position. With regard to the Icelandic and the fist table, the current participants should also agree in the grammatical case. If a sentence begins with „A number of,“ should the following verb be singular or plural? For example, if a sentence refers to a number of objections, is it fair or should you use it? In this case, the figure is a vague indication of the amount of objections, but the objections themselves are at the centre of the sentence: „A number of objections have been raised.“ The difference may seem negligible, but in a construction „series“ although the multiplicity of phenomena is important in the sentence, the identity of the phenomena – objections, in the first example above – is the essential information. Similarly, in the second example, the reader must know which objects the amount indicated is, but the point of the sentence is the quantity; Therefore, number is the key word. The very irregular verb is the only verb with more coherence than this one in the contemporary form. The predicate corresponds in number to the subject, and if it is copulatory (i.e. it consists of a noun/ajective and a verb that agrees on the number with the subject).

For example: A k-nyvek ardek voltak „Books were interesting“ (a: this: „k-nyv“: book, „erkes“: interesting, „voltak“: were): the plural is marked on the theme as well as on the addjectival and the copulatory part of the predicate.